North Carolina Personal Injury Lawyers: Hardison & Associates  
NORTH CAROLINA INJURY OFFICES
 

Raleigh   |  Dunn  |  Fayetteville  |  Southern Pines
Durham  
|  Greensboro  |  Charlotte  |  Wilmington
 
1(800)-434-8399   
|    Office Details
 


About Our Lawyers
About Our Firm
Our Attorneys
Our Staff
How We Work
Employment Opportunities

Client Rights
Bill of Rights
Client Advocate
 
Practice Areas: Injuries, Accidents, Workers Compensation
Car Accidents
Truck Accidents
School Bus Accidents
Immigration
Personal Injury
Workers Compensation
Social Security Disability
     - VA Disability
Nursing Home Negligence
Catastrophic Injuries
Mass Torts
Serzone
Stock Fraud Victims
Vioxx
Guidant Defibrillators
Bextra
Fosamax
Ortho Evra
ACE Inhibitors
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
ReNu MoistureLoc Contact Solution
Bard Composix Kugel Large Patches

Legal Questions & Answers
Car Accidents FAQs
Truck Accidents FAQs
Immigration FAQs
Personal Injury FAQs
Workers Compensation FAQs
Nursing Home Negligence FAQs
Catastrophic Injuries FAQs
Mass Torts FAQs
Social Security FAQs
Fosamax FAQs
Stock Fraud FAQs
ReNu MoistureLoc Contact Solution FAQs

Client Testimonials
Articles
Injury Glossary
Legal Resources: Research, Links, Lawyers
North Carolina Communities: Raleigh, Wake County, Greensboro, Triangle, Durham, Charlotte, Fayetteville
Contact Our Injury Lawyers
Site Map


Legal News Feeds
NC Accident Headlines
NC Workers' Compensation News
Social Security Disability Headlines
 



En Español

But I Fell On Their Property

One of the most common misperceptions I encounter is when a person is injured on someone else’s property. Invariably, most people believe that the person who owns or is in charge of the property is automatically responsible. However, the key to whether or not someone is “responsible” is fault, not ownership. Simply because someone owns or rents property where someone is hurt does not mean they are “responsible.”

In North Carolina, a property owner has a duty to exercise reasonable care to provide for the safety of all lawful visitors on his or her property. Defining reasonable care varies depending upon the circumstances of each case. However, our courts have said that a property owner has a duty to warn a lawful visitor of hidden perils or unsafe conditions insofar as they know of them, or that can be


 

NAME:


PHONE:


EMAIL:


HOW DID YOU HEAR
ABOUT US?

QUESTIONS/COMMENTS:

 

ascertained by reasonable inspection and supervision.

Even though a property owner owes any lawful visitor these duties, the visitor has a duty to exercise reasonable care. This is especially true in premises liability cases. Our courts have repeatedly stated that the visitor owes a duty to themselves to keep a proper lookout for dangerous conditions. If a condition or hazard causes them injury, and if they could have detected or avoided such condition or hazard by keeping a proper lookout, then the visitor was contributorily negligent, or negligent themselves, and cannot recover. Additionally, if the condition or hazard was obvious or the person knew of it, the injured person will usually be considered to be contributorily negligent.

Most lawyers will tell you that premises liability cases are some of the most difficult cases to win in North Carolina. This is mainly due to the fact that more often than not, regular, ordinary people on a jury will believe that someone should have been watching where they were walking, and if they did, then they would have seen the problem. While we all know that is not always true, nonetheless some jurors will believe that and find an injured person to be contributorily negligent, and thus precluding any recovery.

Additionally, difficulty arises with the manner in which one fell. Particularly, where a person has slipped or tripped, the injured person must show that the property owner knew or should have known of the problem and did not fix it. It is somewhat rare to find a property owner who knew of a danger and did not correct it. Many times a property owner does not know of the danger. Thus, the injured person must show that the property owner should have known of the problem, which involves evidence of how long the condition existed, how apparent was it, and so forth. However, the more obvious the danger is, and more likely the property owner should have known of it, the more likely it is the injured person should have seen it as well. As you can see, the evidence does not only point towards one person in some cases.

So, if you are injured on someone else’s property, just because they own it doesn’t necessarily mean they are responsible for your injuries. You should immediately consult with a lawyer who can ask the right questions to see if the facts surrounding your injury will or will not support a claim against the property owner.


Legal Links   Legal Resources   North Carolina Lawyers   Personal Injury Lawyers
© - Hardison & Associates / ASK LAWYER NC. Attorneys at Law, Raleigh, NC.  - All rights reserved.
North Carolina Personal Injury Law Firm representing Car Accidents, Truck Accidents, Workers Compensation, Social Security Disability Claims,
Nursing Home Abuse & Negligence, Catastrophic, Car, Truck & Other Vehicular Accidents / Injuries
Including Mass Torts such as Vioxx, Stock & Securities Fraud, and Broker Misconduct - Serving Raleigh, Dunn, Durham, Charlotte,
Greensboro, High Point, Southern Pines, Fayetteville and surrounding Wake County, Orange, Johnston,
Chatham, Harnett, Nash, Franklin, Cumberland, NC Counties - Site by Consultwebs.com, Inc. - Webs for Lawyers | Law Firms